Search found 30 matches
- Thu Jul 31, 2025 11:31 am
- Forum: Usage, tips and tricks
- Topic: Error: "Send e-mail@MW-SPC2: The requested body part was not found in this message."
- Replies: 3
- Views: 22949
Re: Error: "Send e-mail@MW-SPC2: The requested body part was not found in this message."
Years later and still trying to figure this out. It's also not working via the webgui, still getting the same error. Does anyone have a solution for this?
- Wed Jul 03, 2024 9:12 am
- Forum: Usage, tips and tricks
- Topic: Avisynth - DeJitter plugin
- Replies: 1
- Views: 10117
Avisynth - DeJitter plugin
I'm trying to create a workflow that DeJitters (using AviSynth Dejitter plugin: http://www.avisynth.nl/users/vcmohan/DeJitter/DeJitter.htm) drone footage. I've tried several things but can't get it to work. What I have setup is: - A/V Media node - Custom AviSynth Node: # Load the DeJitter plugin Loa...
- Tue Jul 05, 2022 9:28 am
- Forum: Usage, tips and tricks
- Topic: Error: "Send e-mail@MW-SPC2: The requested body part was not found in this message."
- Replies: 3
- Views: 22949
Error: "Send e-mail@MW-SPC2: The requested body part was not found in this message."
I'm trying to get the 'send e-mail' node working, but I keep on getting this error: "Send e-mail@MW-SPC2: The requested body part was not found in this message." I've tried using different email addresses, changing the body text from nothing to just the word 'test' etc. Can anyone advise o...
- Tue Sep 14, 2021 3:28 pm
- Forum: Bug reporting
- Topic: XDCAM Encode / Blockiness
- Replies: 14
- Views: 27926
Re: XDCAM Encode / Blockiness
Hi,
I tried qmin5 qmax23 and compared in Premiere switching videotracks. And you can clearly see that FFMPEG exposes more blocks in the dress. But the complete picture gets less detail al together!
I tried qmin5 qmax23 and compared in Premiere switching videotracks. And you can clearly see that FFMPEG exposes more blocks in the dress. But the complete picture gets less detail al together!
- Tue Sep 14, 2021 8:29 am
- Forum: Bug reporting
- Topic: XDCAM Encode / Blockiness
- Replies: 14
- Views: 27926
Re: XDCAM Encode / Blockiness
Hi, We tried some different qmin / qmax settings but we cannot get near the quality of premiere with this example footage. I also checked with other videofiles and there is actualy no noticable quality difference so I also suspect it has to do with the source material that does not work quite good w...
- Tue Sep 07, 2021 8:51 am
- Forum: Bug reporting
- Topic: XDCAM Encode / Blockiness
- Replies: 14
- Views: 27926
Re: XDCAM Encode / Blockiness
So for example qmin 3 qmax 20. I read that lowering qmax below 16 wil not improve anything visible. This will not have any influence on the bitrate?
- Tue Sep 07, 2021 8:34 am
- Forum: Bug reporting
- Topic: XDCAM Encode / Blockiness
- Replies: 14
- Views: 27926
Re: XDCAM Encode / Blockiness
Hi!
Great. It looks better, but still premiere pro has a better quality. Can I play with qmin and qmax for a little experimenting? Because I think we can assign more bittrate to the B and P frames. I will then compare in resolve with a differencekey.
Greetings,
David
Great. It looks better, but still premiere pro has a better quality. Can I play with qmin and qmax for a little experimenting? Because I think we can assign more bittrate to the B and P frames. I will then compare in resolve with a differencekey.
Greetings,
David
- Thu Jul 08, 2021 9:24 pm
- Forum: Bug reporting
- Topic: XDCAM Encode / Blockiness
- Replies: 14
- Views: 27926
XDCAM Encode / Blockiness
Hi, I have an issue where I encode to XDCAM and get random frames with blockiness/artefacts. Our worklfow is: Colorgrade in Davinci Resolve (Source is an Avid Videomixdown in OP1A XAVC-Intra 100) Export to QT DNxHD185X to a watchfolder FFAStrans encodes this file to XDCAM. We use this workflow becau...
- Thu Jun 24, 2021 10:08 am
- Forum: Usage, tips and tricks
- Topic: Modify Source field in status monitor
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5690
Re: Modify Source field in status monitor
Nevermind. I have done it with s_success that works fine.
- Thu Jun 24, 2021 9:55 am
- Forum: Usage, tips and tricks
- Topic: Modify Source field in status monitor
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5690
Modify Source field in status monitor
Hi, Could I modify the way the source field is created in the status monitor after a job has finished? I have a unified workflow scanning multiple client folders, but when the workflow is finished it only shows me the filename and I would like to add some extra info so we know where this file came f...