Hello,
I think I could use this good feature in 0.9.0 in maintenance menu of workflow : Remove monitored file record from history cache.
Now, in 0.9.0.3 it seems inoperative...
I create a simple workflow (folder>custom ffmpeg encode>delivery>delete original by command executor)to check and when I drop again the same file nothing happens.
Maybe I'm wrong but I really believe It works before.
Please, can you tell me Steinar?
Thank you very much.
B.
Problem cache in 0.9.0.3?
Re: Problem cache in 0.9.0.3?
Hi,
I'm sorry but the option was actually removed but the replacement was never documented. This will be fixed for the next release. Each history record is a seperate file stored in the new "%s_cache_record%" variable. So you need to use the "Command executor" instead:
%comspec% /c "if exist "%s_cache_record%" del /f /q "%s_cache_record%""
This should work with the current 0.9.0.3 release, it just lacks the documentation for it.
-steinar
I'm sorry but the option was actually removed but the replacement was never documented. This will be fixed for the next release. Each history record is a seperate file stored in the new "%s_cache_record%" variable. So you need to use the "Command executor" instead:
%comspec% /c "if exist "%s_cache_record%" del /f /q "%s_cache_record%""
This should work with the current 0.9.0.3 release, it just lacks the documentation for it.
-steinar
Re: Problem cache in 0.9.0.3?
Hi Steinar,
Great, it will be very useful for me!!!
I must say avoid cache can be very important for specific workflow so good news if you can fix it in next release.
Thanks for the solution.
Cheers.
B.
PS: YES, the del %record_cache% works fine
thanks!
Great, it will be very useful for me!!!
I must say avoid cache can be very important for specific workflow so good news if you can fix it in next release.
Thanks for the solution.
Cheers.
B.
PS: YES, the del %record_cache% works fine
thanks!