Hi emcodem
No, you did not. Since I have started webinterface in "log capture" mode, it is working coreectly. Curious
Two small bugs in Webinterface 1.3.0
Re: Two small bugs in Webinterface 1.3.0
BR,
Silicon
--------
FFAStrans 1.3.0.2; WebInterface 1.3.0.0
Manager: VM: 2x Xeon E5-2630v3@2.4GHz, 8GB RAM
Workers: 3x HP DL360 G9 (2x Xeon E5-2643v3@3.4GHz,16GB RAM, nVidia M2000)+ 2x Lenovo SR665 (2x AMD EPYC730216C@3.0GHz,128GB RAM, nVidia P2200)
Silicon
--------
FFAStrans 1.3.0.2; WebInterface 1.3.0.0
Manager: VM: 2x Xeon E5-2630v3@2.4GHz, 8GB RAM
Workers: 3x HP DL360 G9 (2x Xeon E5-2643v3@3.4GHz,16GB RAM, nVidia M2000)+ 2x Lenovo SR665 (2x AMD EPYC730216C@3.0GHz,128GB RAM, nVidia P2200)
Re: Two small bugs in Webinterface 1.3.0
it knows you are watching, like a VW car
maybe it is about something special you need to do on the interface to make it go mad?
maybe it is about something special you need to do on the interface to make it go mad?
emcodem, wrapping since 2009 you got the rhyme?
Re: Two small bugs in Webinterface 1.3.0
Maybe, but I don't have a clue what magic I should perform to make it mad. Both previous occurances were spontaneous if I remember it correctly.
BR,
Silicon
--------
FFAStrans 1.3.0.2; WebInterface 1.3.0.0
Manager: VM: 2x Xeon E5-2630v3@2.4GHz, 8GB RAM
Workers: 3x HP DL360 G9 (2x Xeon E5-2643v3@3.4GHz,16GB RAM, nVidia M2000)+ 2x Lenovo SR665 (2x AMD EPYC730216C@3.0GHz,128GB RAM, nVidia P2200)
Silicon
--------
FFAStrans 1.3.0.2; WebInterface 1.3.0.0
Manager: VM: 2x Xeon E5-2630v3@2.4GHz, 8GB RAM
Workers: 3x HP DL360 G9 (2x Xeon E5-2643v3@3.4GHz,16GB RAM, nVidia M2000)+ 2x Lenovo SR665 (2x AMD EPYC730216C@3.0GHz,128GB RAM, nVidia P2200)
Re: Two small bugs in Webinterface 1.3.0
Hi emcodem
Update: I have switched webinterface back from "log capture" to normal mode 2 weeks ago and since then it is working correctly
Update: I have switched webinterface back from "log capture" to normal mode 2 weeks ago and since then it is working correctly
BR,
Silicon
--------
FFAStrans 1.3.0.2; WebInterface 1.3.0.0
Manager: VM: 2x Xeon E5-2630v3@2.4GHz, 8GB RAM
Workers: 3x HP DL360 G9 (2x Xeon E5-2643v3@3.4GHz,16GB RAM, nVidia M2000)+ 2x Lenovo SR665 (2x AMD EPYC730216C@3.0GHz,128GB RAM, nVidia P2200)
Silicon
--------
FFAStrans 1.3.0.2; WebInterface 1.3.0.0
Manager: VM: 2x Xeon E5-2630v3@2.4GHz, 8GB RAM
Workers: 3x HP DL360 G9 (2x Xeon E5-2643v3@3.4GHz,16GB RAM, nVidia M2000)+ 2x Lenovo SR665 (2x AMD EPYC730216C@3.0GHz,128GB RAM, nVidia P2200)
Re: Two small bugs in Webinterface 1.3.0
Hi @emcodem
I think we have identified the root cause of the issue - as you've predicted in your response from July 12, it is caused by "file with a special filename". I'll PM you the API call response dump you've requested earlier.
Now we need to find out who is to blame for creating file names with strange characters.
I think we have identified the root cause of the issue - as you've predicted in your response from July 12, it is caused by "file with a special filename". I'll PM you the API call response dump you've requested earlier.
Now we need to find out who is to blame for creating file names with strange characters.
BR,
Silicon
--------
FFAStrans 1.3.0.2; WebInterface 1.3.0.0
Manager: VM: 2x Xeon E5-2630v3@2.4GHz, 8GB RAM
Workers: 3x HP DL360 G9 (2x Xeon E5-2643v3@3.4GHz,16GB RAM, nVidia M2000)+ 2x Lenovo SR665 (2x AMD EPYC730216C@3.0GHz,128GB RAM, nVidia P2200)
Silicon
--------
FFAStrans 1.3.0.2; WebInterface 1.3.0.0
Manager: VM: 2x Xeon E5-2630v3@2.4GHz, 8GB RAM
Workers: 3x HP DL360 G9 (2x Xeon E5-2643v3@3.4GHz,16GB RAM, nVidia M2000)+ 2x Lenovo SR665 (2x AMD EPYC730216C@3.0GHz,128GB RAM, nVidia P2200)
Re: Two small bugs in Webinterface 1.3.0
Thanks a lot for the infos Silicon.
Well in first place, characters shouldnt matter at all. It is also not yet 100% clear if the problem is really related to a special char or if it's more like a concurrency issue where multiple jobs want to write into ffastrans log.txt (monitor log) simultanous.
Anyway, i catch this issue now in newest release of webinterface and bring up an alert box that tells you to delete the ffastrans job log in ffastrans status monitor and restart ffastrans service to come around the problem.
On ffastrans side we are also taking multiple actions that should prevent this problem to happen again. We most likely end up by just skipping the one affected job but anything is better than it's now. Of course this will only be available in the next ffastrans release early next year or such.
Well in first place, characters shouldnt matter at all. It is also not yet 100% clear if the problem is really related to a special char or if it's more like a concurrency issue where multiple jobs want to write into ffastrans log.txt (monitor log) simultanous.
Anyway, i catch this issue now in newest release of webinterface and bring up an alert box that tells you to delete the ffastrans job log in ffastrans status monitor and restart ffastrans service to come around the problem.
On ffastrans side we are also taking multiple actions that should prevent this problem to happen again. We most likely end up by just skipping the one affected job but anything is better than it's now. Of course this will only be available in the next ffastrans release early next year or such.
emcodem, wrapping since 2009 you got the rhyme?