Filter | Interlacing
Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2021 6:08 pm
Hi Admin-Team,
I have a question.
Concerning the Interlacing filter.
At first: it is a very very nice and promising feature which I would love to integrate into my a/v-check-workflows.
Very nice is getting information about scantype not only from metadata but from analyzing.
I have played a little bit around.
Created a messy file.
Let it analyze.
Got a score of 34.
Did expect such a low score.
Said to myself: very good, in the documentation it is said that as higher the number of "confident" is the analyzer got it right.
In such a case of 34 I would expect that there has happened something wrong with file conversion and I have to check the file.
But ...
When I analyzed a file which was consolidated into Avid, keeping it natively, kept the Avid Project Settings same as original and exported the file with same scantype I would expect to get a score of 100.
But that did not happen.
Aaaaand: are there any real world values where I could say to myself "ah ok, 95 is a value where I should not be worried about the media"?
Maybe I'm thinking in the wrong direction about the correct usage of the filter.
Best
Taner
I have a question.
Concerning the Interlacing filter.
At first: it is a very very nice and promising feature which I would love to integrate into my a/v-check-workflows.
Very nice is getting information about scantype not only from metadata but from analyzing.
I have played a little bit around.
Created a messy file.
Let it analyze.
Got a score of 34.
Did expect such a low score.
Said to myself: very good, in the documentation it is said that as higher the number of "confident" is the analyzer got it right.
In such a case of 34 I would expect that there has happened something wrong with file conversion and I have to check the file.
But ...
When I analyzed a file which was consolidated into Avid, keeping it natively, kept the Avid Project Settings same as original and exported the file with same scantype I would expect to get a score of 100.
But that did not happen.
Aaaaand: are there any real world values where I could say to myself "ah ok, 95 is a value where I should not be worried about the media"?
Maybe I'm thinking in the wrong direction about the correct usage of the filter.
Best
Taner