local caching - long time to finish a job
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2018 5:38 pm
Hi Steinar,
I've tested local caching because it drastically improves transcoding-speed (depending on the hardware).
I dropped a dozen files into a watchfolder monitored by all my 5 transcoding-machines.
So far so good.
But sometimes I had to wait a long time until a job was finished (compared to previous setup with global shared media cache).
Example: a machine picks up a file, then in the status-monitor is shown "waiting for (next) processour ressources", then transcoding starts, then again "wait for free processour ressources"...and so on.
Actually quite normal waiting for processor ressources but it takes sometimes a couple of minutes until the machine moves to the next step.
This does not change even if I reduce maximum jobs to a single job for each machine.
The machine has only this one job to do at that moment.
It does not only happen with specific files or machines.
Is this a normal behaviour?
Best
Taner
I've tested local caching because it drastically improves transcoding-speed (depending on the hardware).
I dropped a dozen files into a watchfolder monitored by all my 5 transcoding-machines.
So far so good.
But sometimes I had to wait a long time until a job was finished (compared to previous setup with global shared media cache).
Example: a machine picks up a file, then in the status-monitor is shown "waiting for (next) processour ressources", then transcoding starts, then again "wait for free processour ressources"...and so on.
Actually quite normal waiting for processor ressources but it takes sometimes a couple of minutes until the machine moves to the next step.
This does not change even if I reduce maximum jobs to a single job for each machine.
The machine has only this one job to do at that moment.
It does not only happen with specific files or machines.
Is this a normal behaviour?
Best
Taner