email processor
email processor
Hi all
I have a workflow with 3 branch (for 3 different transcode) and when it is completed I would like to send an email.
I have put a "hold" processor to wait for each branch at the end of the encode process. after that,I delete the source file and at the top end I send an email.
My pb is that FFAStrans send 3 email instead of one.
Do you have any idea how can I have only one mail ?
bye
I have a workflow with 3 branch (for 3 different transcode) and when it is completed I would like to send an email.
I have put a "hold" processor to wait for each branch at the end of the encode process. after that,I delete the source file and at the top end I send an email.
My pb is that FFAStrans send 3 email instead of one.
Do you have any idea how can I have only one mail ?
bye
Re: email processor
Hello Ghtais,
You could insert a populate node at the start of each encode node, the same variable will be populated.
e.g: you set %i_continue% to 0 on the first 2 branches and the third to 1. After the hold node you can conditionally test if %i_continue% = 1, and if yes, continue to email.
Only 1 mail will be sent
cheers.
Benjamin
You could insert a populate node at the start of each encode node, the same variable will be populated.
e.g: you set %i_continue% to 0 on the first 2 branches and the third to 1. After the hold node you can conditionally test if %i_continue% = 1, and if yes, continue to email.
Only 1 mail will be sent
cheers.
Benjamin
Re: email processor
Hey Ghtais (finally i got your name right, damned selective perception!)
Maybe this topic helps you to understand and solve your problem
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=543&p=4665&hilit=branch+end#p4665
Maybe this topic helps you to understand and solve your problem
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=543&p=4665&hilit=branch+end#p4665
emcodem, wrapping since 2009 you got the rhyme?
Re: email processor
Hi
Whaouu this is very very cunning
not logical but very cunning.
I'am going to try it as soon as possible. thank you for your help !
bye
Whaouu this is very very cunning
not logical but very cunning.
I'am going to try it as soon as possible. thank you for your help !
bye
Re: email processor
Tested and approved !!!
it works great. In reality, I inserted only one populate node on one branch and put the conditional just after the Hold processor.
I would say thank you to Emcodem and momocampo for their precious help.
bye
it works great. In reality, I inserted only one populate node on one branch and put the conditional just after the Hold processor.
I would say thank you to Emcodem and momocampo for their precious help.
bye
Re: email processor
Great!!
Happy to hear it's ok for you
Cheers.
B.
Happy to hear it's ok for you
Cheers.
B.
Re: email processor
haha, may I have spoken a little bit too quickly.
It doesn't work if FFAStrans execute the workflow in parallel with 2 files . In this condition, I don't receive any mail and it gives me an error.
I have to check why it is a bit tricky like this.
It doesn't work if FFAStrans execute the workflow in parallel with 2 files . In this condition, I don't receive any mail and it gives me an error.
I have to check why it is a bit tricky like this.
Re: email processor
Hello Ghtais,
Could you share your workflow please? It will be easier to find the issue.
Thanks.
B.
Could you share your workflow please? It will be easier to find the issue.
Thanks.
B.
Re: email processor
Hello Benjamin
Sorry I cannot share my workflow here because there is some confidential information on it (password, user and IP for our FTP and network drive, personal email addresses, etc)
But don't worry I think it is not a big deal. First, I have to try to put the populate processor on the longest time processing branch.
Secondly, I noticed that I have set 3600 seconds in the Hold processor which seem to be not enough.
I will keep you inform if this change or not.
Sorry I cannot share my workflow here because there is some confidential information on it (password, user and IP for our FTP and network drive, personal email addresses, etc)
But don't worry I think it is not a big deal. First, I have to try to put the populate processor on the longest time processing branch.
Secondly, I noticed that I have set 3600 seconds in the Hold processor which seem to be not enough.
I will keep you inform if this change or not.
Re: email processor
Hi,
Ok let us know if you need something else. Remember we have to see each other
Ok let us know if you need something else. Remember we have to see each other